Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z270M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161125
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateAug 01 '17 at 05:44
Run Duration333 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 214
82% 141 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 830
70% 604 Pts
64-Core 830
51% 830 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Asus(1043 0501) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.6.2
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.4% Average
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 68.6
42% 61.6 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 54.8
46% 56.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 500GB-$100
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 501
Write 349
Mixed 337
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 19.2
96% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 41.6
96% 201 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 103%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
155GB free
Firmware: ML6OA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 82.2
Write 52.1
Mixed 71.3
52% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.62
4K Mixed 0.19
45% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 73%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 4GB
4GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
9.07% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 3.69
Mixed 7.26
10% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.77
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 1.08
100% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.07%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$299
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 25.6
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 22.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $508
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback