Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 96% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170711
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '17 at 04:57
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Memory 74.9 1-Core 143 2-Core 284 90% 167 Pts	4-Core 537 8-Core 916 88% 726 Pts	64-Core 1,521 94% 1,521 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6390) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	108% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 153 Parallax 168 111% 152 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 161 Splatting 118 108% 133 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2852 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 694 (B1) Unknown 99 99 51 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 54 47 46 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 146 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13526074356	89.5% Excellent	Read 499 Write 233 Mixed 288 75% 340 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 91.6 4K Mixed 36 143% 53.3 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 101 119% 208 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 124%
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 25GB free Firmware: 2CV102M3 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 11736 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2305 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 185 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 223392 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 4445440 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 1 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 1015579300 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 97 97 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	35.8% Below average	Read 255 Write 82.1 Mixed 124 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 44.7 4K Mixed 6.01 52% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 76.8 DQ Mixed 45.4 56% 101 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 44%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 987GB free Firmware: CC4H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 73602385 (03) Spinup time 100 90 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2609 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 71 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 129805394 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 11664 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2315 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 279177134147 (BD) vendor-specific 9 9 91 (BE) vendor-specific 54 44 189753327662 (C2) HDA temperature 46 56 55834574894 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 24 24 73602385 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 76746770623877 (F1) Unknown 100 253 58342767 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2512185755	58.7% Above average	Read 98.3 Write 106 Mixed 94.4 75% 99.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.45 105% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 70%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 460GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 77 69 7235 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14309 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 13652 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5608 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 32 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 52 206158626855 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 313 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 107816	67.7% Good	Read 116 Write 119 Mixed 101 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.26 4K Mixed 0.42 115% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3466 C16 2x8GB 1,481 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.7% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 13 48% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 8.9 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 90.6 44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING - $275

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	486x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	335x
Core i9-7900XIntel $455Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	248x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	382x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	150x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	118x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	81x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	72x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	63x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	54x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	41x
F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 85%, 19,774 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $1,338

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16