Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120106
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '17 at 05:48
Run Duration	655 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 87.4 2-Core 164 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 415 45% 356 Pts	64-Core 459 28% 459 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 2768) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.89 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Lighting 33.5 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 39.3 27% 34.5 fps	MRender 42.3 Gravity 39.7 Splatting 34.9 32% 39 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 229GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5910 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 129 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 45 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 66 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17347838431	53.1% Above average	Read 234 Write 191 Mixed 187 45% 204 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 20.4 100% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 34.1 DQ Write 68.8 DQ Mixed 20.8 24% 41.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 54GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 24338 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 292 (B1) Unknown 82 82 212 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 39 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 137 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24204294526	32.9% Below average	Read 124 Write 85.8 Mixed 85.9 22% 98.7 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 29 4K Mixed 13.1 73% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 28.7 DQ Write 33.5 DQ Mixed 14.4 16% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 108%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$78 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 917GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 218 177 4091 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4349 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 59 59 30181 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 445 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 194 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4154 (C2) HDA temperature 111 98 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	47.6% Average	Read 80.4 Write 85.2 Mixed 96.8 66% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.12 68% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 88%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 358GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 223 5850 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5005 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 29 29 52231 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1741 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 529 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5005 (C2) HDA temperature 107 87 43 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.6% Below average	Read 71.6 Write 52.2 Mixed 35.4 39% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.33 87% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 76%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$105 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 196 5216 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 187 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6726 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 124 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 88 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 393 (C2) HDA temperature 117 104 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	60.6% Good	Read 96.7 Write 114 Mixed 93.2 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.22 91% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 99%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 32GB-$13 3,792 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 30GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 33.1 Write 23.7 Mixed 8.29 24% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.03 4K Write 0.55 4K Mixed 0.45 41% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 33%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB 23,482 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 27GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	6.89% Terrible	Read 21 Write 5.24 Mixed 5.95 11% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.81 4K Write 0.58 4K Mixed 0.16 40% 1.52 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.89% Great: 19%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB 33,521 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 14GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 23.4 Write 5.84 Mixed 8.93 13% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.12 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 1.14 119% 2.39 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	53.4% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 21.6 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 13.8 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 62.9 64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	627x
Core i7 930Intel $249Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	403x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	217x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	148x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	104x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	102x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	70x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	57x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	342x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	330x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	224x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16