| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.2 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20170303 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 09 '17 at 23:20 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.3%
Very good
|
75% 135 Pts
|
59% 441 Pts
|
27% 442 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
MSI(1462 8A9C) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.94
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
17% 18.1 fps
|
16% 20.1 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.8%
Average
|
46% 16.3 GB/s
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
44% 91.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M Pro4 Builds (Compare 179 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 27x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 24x |
| Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 15x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 11x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $258 |