Asus A78M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus A78M-E  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '17 at 20:07
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 142
60% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 219
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Zotac(19DA 730B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.98% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 6.96
Parallax 7.53
5% 6.83 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 7.22
5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.98%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD340 128GB-$88
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN263 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 475
Write 127
Mixed 200
58% 268 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 13.3
94% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22.3
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 14
28% 53.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57%
Great: 84%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
443GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 83.6
Write 79.5
Mixed 79.1
61% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.38
97% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 57%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
132GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 56.1
Write 48.8
Mixed 49.8
39% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.37
101% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 51%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
155GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 179
Mixed 161
128% 171 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.21
90% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
551GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
35% Below average
Read 99.2
Write 88.8
Mixed 84.4
115% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 0.37
4K Mixed 0.22
22% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35%
Great: 63%
Innostor Innostor 32GB
29GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 85.7
Write 7.9
Mixed 25.5
37% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.07
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.002
30% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.3% Below average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 12.2
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A78M-E Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A78M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $88
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback