Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '17 at 14:12
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9370-$194 9,054 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	38.1% Below average	Memory 33.7 1-Core 57.5 2-Core 118 38% 69.7 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 377 37% 303 Pts	64-Core 405 25% 405 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3285) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Lighting 71.6 Reflection 68.7 Parallax 60.3 58% 66.8 fps	MRender 68.9 Gravity 65.6 Splatting 69.1 56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 478GB 728 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.10 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 338 Write 307 Mixed 222 64% 289 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 10.9 77% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 21.3 DQ Write 51.2 DQ Mixed 10.3 15% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 39118760 (03) Spinup time 99 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2188 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 4674074 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2629 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 913 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 6 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 62 54 640024614 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 245 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 11939 (C2) HDA temperature 38 46 51539607590 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 19095424598980 (F1) Unknown 100 253 13132470169 (F2) Unknown 100 253 51311631779
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 533GB free Firmware: 2AJ1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 95 Write 97.2 Mixed 89.6 71% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.32 82% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 50%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 422GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 173 6125 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1966 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2587 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 876 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 304 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4430 (C2) HDA temperature 114 108 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	73.1% Very good	Read 135 Write 120 Mixed 72 81% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.27 93% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB 827 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.3% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 7.6 23% 7.93 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.7 13% 4.5 GB/s	Latency 234 17% 234 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	379x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16