Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 REV 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111130
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '17 at 17:40
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2300 19,722 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Memory 65.7 1-Core 81.2 2-Core 164 59% 104 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 321 43% 322 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180 23,273 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gainward(10B0 0801) 1GB CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 1010 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 384.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.98% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.23 Parallax 0.34 1% 0.88 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 1.65 1% 1.44 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 0.98% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 92 92 18414591 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 -75462575381280 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2837 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 13 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 18414591 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 18414591 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 18414591 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 12803 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10397 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10397 (F2) Unknown 0 0 13844	49.2% Average	Read 491 Write 135 Mixed 203 60% 276 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 40.9 4K Mixed 11.1 68% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 21.4 DQ Write 47.5 DQ Mixed 11 15% 26.6 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1TB free Firmware: CC3C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 736 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4407 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 4347641944 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13379 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3083 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 24 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 51 571867169 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 103 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 5252 (C2) HDA temperature 33 49 51539607585 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 31 10 736 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 78894254267715 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3619248714 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2566118791	57.8% Above average	Read 103 Write 98.4 Mixed 76.9 69% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.4 92% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB 1,459 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	30.4% Below average	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 9.2 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 10.8 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	160x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	124x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	48x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	22x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	15x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $546

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16