PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | MSI MS-7599 |
Motherboard | MSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599) (all builds) |
Memory | 1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100909 |
Uptime | 13.3 Days |
Run Date | Aug 13 '17 at 19:25 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
48.6%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
MSI(1462 2875) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 368.39
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
55.1%
Above average
|
||||
83.9%
Excellent
|
||||
41.9%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 11x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 8x |
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 4x |
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 3x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $192 |