| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 30.1% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Windows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
8 months ago, 6 months ago.
| System | Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6 |
| Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20151021 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 13 '17 at 22:35 |
| Run Duration | 88 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
30.1%
Below average
|
29% 92.4 fps
|
31% 73.2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
109%
Outstanding
|
136% 181 MB/s
|
114% 1.12 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
25.8%
Poor
|
25% 8.63 GB/s
|
20% 7 GB/s
|
40% 100 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Typical K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6 Builds (Compare 544 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
|
|
|
System: Asus K30BF_M32BF_A_F_K31BF_6
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 4,063 samples | 463x |
| A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 43%, 8,167 samples | 57x |
| A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $130Bench 46%, 3,305 samples | 14x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 9%, 9,167 samples | 214x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 39%, 131,721 samples | 49x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 7%, 6,471 samples | 28x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 107% - Outstanding | Total price: $80 |