Hp-pavilion VG240AA-ABU s5202uk

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, RAM
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemHp-pavilion VG240AA-ABU s5202uk  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Narra6
Memory5.6 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1768 x 992 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '17 at 22:59
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Athlon II X2 215
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
SC Int 42.7
SC Float 19
SC Mixed 31.4
25% 31 Pts
QC Int 85.9
QC Float 43.2
QC Mixed 69.6
15% 66.2 Pts
MC Int 112
MC Float 66.4
MC Mixed 85.9
13% 88.1 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 24%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 848F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
1.14% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 1.1
1% 3.3 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 4.2
1% 3.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.14%
Great: 2%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$19
242GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 96.4
Write 96.9
Mixed 90.4
71% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.38
95% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 59%
WD Elements 2TB
681GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 22.5
Write 21.6
Mixed 21.8
28% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.18
51% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 47%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical VG240AA-ABU s5202uk Builds (Compare 0 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%

System: Hp-pavilion VG240AA-ABU s5202uk

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $175Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $125
Intel Core i5-8600K $222AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $177SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback