bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DH55PJ
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '17 at 04:41
Run Duration	106 Seconds
Run User	HND-User
Background CPU	81%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	7.42% Terrible	Memory 2.95 1-Core 32 2-Core 36.3 12% 23.8 Pts	4-Core 67.9 8-Core 69 9% 68.4 Pts	64-Core 71 4% 71 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 7.42% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% PNY(196E 11BF) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.5% Poor	Lighting 34.3 Reflection 28.8 Parallax 35.8 28% 32.9 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 36.1 Splatting 34.7 30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 97 12152 (03) Spinup time 100 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3158 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 395957825 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7219 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3088 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 27 27 73 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 45 589365282 (C2) HDA temperature 34 55 47244640290 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 56 34 12152 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 8 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 8 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 14890651622444 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1141197281 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2197212664	41.4% Average	Read 75.4 Write 69 Mixed 86.6 58% 77 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.31 67% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ12GX3M3A2000C10 Kingston 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10% Very poor	MC Read 3 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 475 8% 475 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 12%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,020x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,564x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	931x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,039x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	820x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16