Asus P6T SE

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	38.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P6T SE (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100921
Uptime	8.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '17 at 00:35
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Memory 97.1 1-Core 91.4 2-Core 182 74% 123 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 464 52% 408 Pts	64-Core 465 29% 465 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Asus(1043 8465) 2GB CLim: 1316 MHz, MLim: 1843 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Lighting 46.6 Reflection 42 Parallax 55.7 38% 48.1 fps	MRender 58.3 Gravity 53.2 Splatting 39.2 40% 50.2 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 267GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 419 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 284 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 58 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 31 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8307338087	71.6% Very good	Read 270 Write 211 Mixed 220 52% 234 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 38.5 129% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 84.1 86% 142 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 134%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95 28,095 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 461GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 158 152 5100 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3823 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8449 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3809 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 123 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3823 (C2) HDA temperature 120 104 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	49.5% Average	Read 93.1 Write 79.1 Mixed 78.6 63% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.47 119% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.3% Good	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 23 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 15.5 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 49.8 80% 49.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T SE Builds (Compare 1,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6T SE

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	505x
Core i7 930Intel $249Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	224x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	189x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	70x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	55x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	68x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	35x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	212x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	138x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	137x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16