Asrock H77 Pro4/MVP

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock H77 Pro4/MVP (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120510
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '17 at 12:21
Run Duration	512 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266 8,235 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 98.7 2-Core 196 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 487 54% 428 Pts	64-Core 486 30% 486 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.28 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Lighting 25.2 Reflection 24 Parallax 30.8 21% 26.7 fps	MRender 33.3 Gravity 29.7 Splatting 25.3 24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 26GB free Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19721 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1877 (B1) Unknown 73 73 316 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 50 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 1 1 4294967271 (F1) Unknown 99 99 84364951674	60.6% Good	Read 484 Write 204 Mixed 218 66% 302 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 11 64% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 30.9 77% 163 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 85%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 23551 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2430 (B1) Unknown 61 61 1405 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 46 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 42 (F1) Unknown 99 99 129380451374	47.6% Average	Read 424 Write 141 Mixed 180 54% 248 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 13.5 53% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 33 DQ Mixed 22.5 45% 96.2 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 41GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 68 68 10290 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 10872 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 26492 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 3 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3685 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 2 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 53 504496158 (C2) HDA temperature 64 53 605159460 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 232413 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 3 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	42.6% Average	Read 79.4 Write 69 Mixed 95.1 62% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.34 76% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 58%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 30GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 92 33 (03) Spinup time 74 74 8650 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 12778 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 34813 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3828 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 92 33 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 1756 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 51 571605026 (C2) HDA temperature 59 48 689045545 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 259944 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	43.1% Average	Read 71.1 Write 78.9 Mixed 85.1 59% 78.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.49 108% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 62%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 18GB free Firmware: 10.02E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 184 1408 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3549 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 29623 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2241 (BE) vendor-specific 53 44 47 (C2) HDA temperature 103 94 47 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 9 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	21.6% Poor	Read 37.5 Write 37.4 Mixed 36.9 28% 37.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.29 78% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 35%
Ut165 USB2FlashStorage 4GB 421 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID 0165 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	4.3% Terrible	Read 17.3 Write 3.78 Mixed 1.23 6% 7.44 MB/s	4K Read 3.87 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 16% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.3% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 4,223 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.3% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 16.3 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77 Pro4/MVP Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H77 Pro4/MVP - $164

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	84x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	71x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	33x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	30x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	27x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	15x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 54%, 7,771 samples	10x
1600 CL9 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 7,092 samples	9x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 27,024 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $761

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16