Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150624
Uptime	8.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '17 at 05:18
Run Duration	224 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	67% Good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 76.7 2-Core 151 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 448 44% 363 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 04FB) CLim: 1330 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Lighting 67.8 Reflection 66.7 Parallax 79.8 55% 71.4 fps	MRender 67.4 Gravity 63.7 Splatting 55.7 50% 62.3 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 22651340 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 -66829691116071 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2038 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 620 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 25 38 1009319804953 (C2) HDA temperature 25 38 1009319804953 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 22651340 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 22651340 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 22651340 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 94 94 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 21012 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10586 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10586 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8751	60.3% Good	Read 498 Write 185 Mixed 237 67% 307 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 60.4 4K Mixed 14.6 83% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 40 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 35 48% 83.4 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 51 (03) Spinup time 171 170 4425 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3216 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 9255 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1719 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 287 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 158 158 126298 (C2) HDA temperature 120 110 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 66 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	85.5% Excellent	Read 148 Write 150 Mixed 145 111% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 0.22 106% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 84%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 7,666 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1.5TB free Firmware: JKAOA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 131072 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 100 (03) Spinup time 116 116 51580306031 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 704 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 123 123 34 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 35273 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 675 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 704 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 704 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 184684773407 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3	68% Good	Read 111 Write 126 Mixed 19.5 62% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.42 104% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 70%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 7,666 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1TB free Firmware: JKAOA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 104 (03) Spinup time 118 118 51579585127 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 712 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 123 123 34 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 35273 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 680 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 712 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 712 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 188979740703 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3	59.2% Above average	Read 99.4 Write 107 Mixed 110 80% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.32 81% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 70%
Hitachi HTS545025B9SA00 250GB 2,065 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 229GB free Firmware: PB2OC64G Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 205 205 64424509441 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 5953 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 9707 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 4587 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 291 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 73 73 273608 (C2) HDA temperature 229 229 223339282456 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	47.3% Average	Read 84.2 Write 80.8 Mixed 82 62% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.27 63% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 47%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$20 12,691 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 205GB free Firmware: 0002CE02 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 99 22376527 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 50 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 438803 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 886 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5567 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 17180131333 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 60 521601051 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 704 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 7825 (C2) HDA temperature 27 40 77309411355 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 52 23 22376527 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	42.2% Average	Read 73.7 Write 73.3 Mixed 63.8 53% 70.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.39 82% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 10,715 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 18.1 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 12.7 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FXA-UD5 Builds (Compare 331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 - $192

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	143x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	28x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	24x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	25x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	28x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $490

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16