HP Compaq Elite 8300 Convertible MT

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 Convertible MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 29 '17 at 18:54
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	61%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 102 2-Core 197 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 508 53% 427 Pts	64-Core 507 31% 507 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.1% Below average	Lighting 36.9 Reflection 29.7 Parallax 29.7 30% 32.1 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 37.5 Splatting 36 30% 37 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$54 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 223GB free Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2012 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 516 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 40 (AE) Unknown 100 100 22 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4066 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 66 43 244813135906 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 5266326006 (F7) Unknown 100 100 166552415 (F8) Unknown 100 100 470351861	58.9% Above average	Read 494 Write 271 Mixed 352 82% 372 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 8.71 44% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 53.7 84% 161 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 183 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 92 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 62 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 5 (EB) Unknown 99 99 14 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1103900242	92.5% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 411 Mixed 420 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 36.3 120% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 17.7 69% 154 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 124%
Samsung Portable SSD T1 250GB 605 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 69GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Read 431 Write 387 Mixed 414 92% 411 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 23.1 81% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 75.6 76% 121 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 71%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 69GB free Firmware: 21.02E25 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 161 155 4941 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2162 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4091 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1734 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 57 34 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 141 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2233 (C2) HDA temperature 113 104 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	31% Below average	Read 53.5 Write 54 Mixed 49.1 39% 52.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.4 103% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 55%
Hitachi HDT721032SLA360 320GB-$26 5,563 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 20GB free Firmware: ST2OA3AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 130 130 121 (03) Spinup time 109 109 17194811622 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2519 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 125 125 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 13205 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1676 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2534 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2534 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 184684576800 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	45.3% Average	Read 91.5 Write 66.1 Mixed 88.4 62% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.33 86% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173BH0-CK0 859B CT51264BA160BJ.M8F 859B CT51264BA160BJ.M8F 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.4% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 15.9 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 17.5 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP Compaq Elite 8300 Convertible MT

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)