Asus H61M-A/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-A/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130124
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '17 at 20:47
Run Duration	298 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Memory 94.4 1-Core 89.6 2-Core 155 69% 113 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 216 29% 215 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% EVGA(3842 2758) 2GB CLim: 1502 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Lighting 22.5 Reflection 18.2 Parallax 19 18% 19.9 fps	MRender 25.4 Gravity 22.1 Splatting 19.1 18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8363 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2934 (B1) Unknown 93 93 82 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 56 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 81 81 18650 (EB) Unknown 99 99 214 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13507839740	42.5% Average	Read 262 Write 131 Mixed 163 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 34.6 4K Mixed 8.76 61% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 25.8 52% 108 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: MN6OA5C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 84 (03) Spinup time 137 137 34386280878 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 482 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 135 135 26 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 39943 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 357 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 580 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 580 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 201864249371 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	82.2% Excellent	Read 144 Write 142 Mixed 113 100% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.96 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.39 115% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 85%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 174GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 196 90 45832 (03) Spinup time 142 140 3891 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2784 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9827 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1921 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 519 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2264 (C2) HDA temperature 118 96 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60.5% Good	Read 102 Write 108 Mixed 98.4 78% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.46 115% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 60%
SanDisk Gaming Xbox 360 8GB 284 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 7GB free, PID 5151 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 15.5 Write 5.08 Mixed 7.28 10% 9.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.39 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 1.54 142% 2.99 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 19.3 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 16.4 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 58.7 68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-A/USB3 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-A/USB3

CPU
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	26x
Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples	22x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	22x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	30x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	15x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
HX128GSSDSATA3 128GBBench 60%, 235 samples	4x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	4x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x
99U5474-026.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 44%, 1,756 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16