Asus ET2702I

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus ET2702I (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK ET2702I
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130701
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '17 at 12:38
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	92%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4430-$124 24,837 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Memory 2.31 1-Core 13.9 2-Core 35 8% 17.1 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 324 41% 311 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M275X 323 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Asus(1043 857D) 2GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Lighting 16.4 Reflection 15.2 Parallax 20.4 13% 17.4 fps	MRender 13 Gravity 14.7 Splatting 17.2 12% 15 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 13%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 559GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 94273416 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3420 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 252421387 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12805 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3244 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 100 (BE) vendor-specific 62 43 558984921126 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 391 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 82 82 36139 (C2) HDA temperature 38 57 17179869222 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 78043850748434 (F1) Unknown 100 253 42993805964 (F2) Unknown 100 253 57546907844	84.7% Excellent	Read 129 Write 167 Mixed 114 102% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 0.93 4K Mixed 0.31 88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GB 1,523 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	47.6% Average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 17.5 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 482 8% 482 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ET2702I Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ET2702I

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	6x
Core i7-4770SIntel $102Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	3x
Core i5-4430Intel $124Bench 65%, 24,837 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon R9 M275XAMDBench 11%, 323 samples	11x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x
860 QVO 1TBSamsung $109Bench 89%, 201,200 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	3x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 54 samples	2x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $113

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16