Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 37.8 2-Core 69.5 25% 53.7 Pts	4-Core 62.9 8-Core 65.5 8% 64.2 Pts	64-Core 59 4% 59 Pts
Poor: 29% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 SE 1,809 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5891 Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Lighting 14.4 Reflection 16.7 Parallax 13.3 12% 14.8 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 14.3 Splatting 14.7 9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.4% Below average	Read 207 Write 166 Mixed 173 40% 182 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 19.1 4K Mixed 14.8 64% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 31.1 DQ Write 48.6 DQ Mixed 18.9 20% 32.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 124%
WD WD2500AVJS-63B6A0 250GB 1,727 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 233GB free Firmware: 12.0 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 74.3 Write 71.9 Mixed 71.6 55% 72.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.45 119% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 51%

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+AMDBench 36%, 5,372 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	1x
Phenom II X4 940AMDBench 49%, 3,675 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6570AMDBench 5%, 19,220 samples	2x
GeForce 7600 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 1,212 samples	1x
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples	1x

SSD
KingSpec 512GBBench 64%, 30 samples	1x
870 EVO 1TBSamsungBench 72%, 46 samples	1x
520 Series 120GBIntel $199Bench 74%, 19,348 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16