Asus CM6870

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus CM6870 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CM6870
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '17 at 01:57
Run Duration	244 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 88.6 1-Core 105 2-Core 214 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 385 8-Core 520 57% 452 Pts	64-Core 519 32% 519 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Asus(1043 835B) 768MB CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 768MB, Driver: 384.94 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Lighting 13.1 Reflection 14.5 Parallax 9.81 11% 12.5 fps	MRender 18.5 Gravity 14.6 Splatting 14.4 13% 15.9 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 350GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11170 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 18 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 51 46 49 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 9 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13195772186
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Maxtor 7H500F0 500GB-$50 993 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 398GB free Firmware: HA431DD0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 171 169 20696 (04) Start/Stop count 252 252 3214 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 236 133 24 (08) Seek timer performance 252 238 47336 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 54382 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 249 249 1832 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 45 35 959381559 (C0) Power-off retract count 253 253 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 36 253 55 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 252 5546 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 1 1 3206 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 1 1 45830 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 199 0 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 252 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 249 124 5 (CB) Run out cancel 253 252 8 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 252 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 253 252 0 (D0) Spin buzz 253 252 0 (D2) Unknown 253 252 0 (D3) Unknown 253 252 0 (D4) Unknown 253 1 0	36.6% Below average	Read 64.8 Write 61.6 Mixed 57.2 46% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 3.85 4K Mixed 0.23 115% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 38%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$35 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 74GB free Firmware: 3.ADA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 95 124571633 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1086 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 212680263 (09) Power-on hours count 64 64 31869 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1082 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 50 45 925892658 (C2) HDA temperature 50 55 77309411378 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 72 56 198093389 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	33.9% Below average	Read 59.6 Write 58.3 Mixed 41.4 40% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.44 103% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 42%
Seagate Desktop 500GB 1,637 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 252GB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 28.9 Write 23.7 Mixed 12.2 26% 21.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.43 71% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 21%
Seagate Backup+ BK 500GB 713 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 59GB free, PID a013 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 25.3 Mixed 15.4 29% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 0.62 4K Mixed 0.19 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNNG 4x4GB 364 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 17.5 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 19.9 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM6870 Builds (Compare 644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6870

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	503x
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples	47x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	21x

GPU
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	17x

RAM
SLA302G08-GGNHC 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 881 samples	56x
EL64C1C1624Z1 4x4GBAdataBench 56%, 506 samples	47x
SLA302G08-GGNNG 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 364 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16