Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170825
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '17 at 12:16
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 73.4 1-Core 111 2-Core 221 75% 135 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 687 64% 533 Pts	64-Core 1,242 77% 1,242 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 169 Reflection 187 Parallax 181 138% 179 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 174 Splatting 118 111% 138 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 469 (05) Reallocated sector count 97 97 51 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2105 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 618 (64) Unknown 100 100 2518016 (65) Unknown 100 100 365280 (AA) Unknown 100 100 51 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 438 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 828 (B2) Unknown 100 100 12 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1229 (B7) Unknown 100 100 8 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 253 (C2) HDA temperature 37 100 197569347621 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 469 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 51 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 216 (E7) Temperature 98 98 2 (E9) Unknown 100 100 4260 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1834 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3460 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5191 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 4144	52.2% Above average	Read 465 Write 253 Mixed 130 62% 282 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 5.56 52% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 47.7 DQ Mixed 23.7 31% 58.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 411GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 60534099 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6793 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 29614277 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4422 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3267 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 21475229704 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 49 707002407 (C2) HDA temperature 39 51 34359738407 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 45 28 60534099 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 24266565235360 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3332363300 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4137581544	52.6% Above average	Read 87.3 Write 96.2 Mixed 101 72% 94.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.34 79% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 41.3 MC Write 39.2 MC Mixed 33.8 109% 38.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 33 SC Mixed 28.8 79% 27.7 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	23x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	18x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $80Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	6x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $715

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)