ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus F1A55 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	9.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus F1A55 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130902
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '17 at 13:44
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Memory 81.8 1-Core 51.5 2-Core 104 51% 79.1 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 178 26% 190 Pts	64-Core 203 12% 203 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Asus(1043 8439) 1GB CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	9.06% Terrible	Lighting 10 Reflection 9.46 Parallax 12 8% 10.5 fps	MRender 13.7 Gravity 12.4 Splatting 13.3 11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.06% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB 22,489 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 42GB free Firmware: S9FM02.8 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4456 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 615 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 30 (AD) Unknown 100 100 7208981 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 30 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 3 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1237195	31.4% Below average	Read 156 Write 123 Mixed 133 31% 138 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 7.91 55% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 27.9 DQ Write 50.3 DQ Mixed 6.65 14% 28.3 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 83%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA50E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 92 (03) Spinup time 118 118 12897681602 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2845 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 30 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 19887 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2673 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2852 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2852 (C2) HDA temperature 153 153 188979544103 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1496	41.9% Average	Read 73.2 Write 73 Mixed 28.1 43% 58.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.12 4K Write 0.46 4K Mixed 0.1 25% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 77%
Samsung HD082GJ 80GB-$23 1,687 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 41GB free Firmware: JE100-19 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 4416 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8486 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 28542 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4968 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 61973 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 65536 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 136 118 671547426 (C2) HDA temperature 151 115 688324637 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 61973 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 196 233 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 95 95 1821	35.2% Below average	Read 60.2 Write 62.3 Mixed 30.2 38% 50.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.39 92% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673GB0-CH9 Kingston 99U5595-002.A00LF M378B5673GB0-CH9 Team-Elite-1333 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.7% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 13.7 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 10.2 23% 7.9 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback