Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics90.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110307
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 25 '17 at 12:53
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 71%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5670
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 96.7
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 142
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 604
52% 447 Pts
64-Core 764
47% 764 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2182 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 125
Parallax 107
93% 115 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 108
Splatting 105
87% 106 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
165GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.3% Good
Read 269
Write 214
Mixed 202
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 29.2
100% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 74.9
DQ Mixed 44.7
53% 94.5 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 133%
Intel 330 Series 180GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.4% Average
Read 263
Write 161
Mixed 181
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 15.2
76% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 58.3
68% 118 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 83%
WD Red 5TB (2014)-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 101
Write 109
Mixed 91.1
75% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.27
115% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 98%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170
493GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 109
Write 113
Mixed 76.5
74% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.27
105% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST31000525SV 1TB-$155
478GB free
Firmware: CV12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 99.7
Write 98.6
Mixed 75.3
68% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST31000525SV 1TB-$155
376GB free
Firmware: CV12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 94.1
Mixed 62.4
62% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.55
108% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x8GB
3 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 21.7
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 51.4
78% 51.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $397
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback