Ztsystem CYPRESS11

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	84.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Ztsystem CYPRESS11 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel S2600CP
Memory	60.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170324
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '17 at 14:41
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 54.7 1-Core 77.6 2-Core 173 55% 102 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 639 58% 486 Pts	64-Core 1,591 98% 1,591 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% MSI(1462 3235) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 110 Parallax 101 89% 107 fps	MRender 95.3 Gravity 100 Splatting 82.3 75% 92.6 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1668 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 487 (64) Unknown 100 100 5603200 (65) Unknown 100 100 948672 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 71 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 96 96 1651 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1282 (B7) Unknown 96 96 22 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 100 171800002593 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 96 96 4 (E9) Unknown 100 100 9684 (EA) Unknown 100 100 5264 (F1) Unknown 100 100 6520 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2938 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	52.3% Above average	Read 467 Write 258 Mixed 127 62% 284 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 17.4 4K Mixed 8.05 38% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 93.3 DQ Mixed 28.9 54% 110 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 737GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 185 173 1750 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1151 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1660 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 616 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 170 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3403 (C2) HDA temperature 105 100 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	94.5% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 155 Mixed 148 120% 159 MB/s	4K Read 1.16 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 0.27 123% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 735GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 171 1858 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1160 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1662 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 615 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 167 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3612 (C2) HDA temperature 104 98 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	89.8% Excellent	Read 154 Write 159 Mixed 146 115% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1.19 4K Write 2.29 4K Mixed 0.36 132% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 19GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 230847872 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4212 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 17346862705 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 9968 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1883 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 52 639893542 (C2) HDA temperature 38 48 73014444070 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 29 25 230847872 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 93132070861505 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1632007771 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1520598104	43.2% Average	Read 74.2 Write 76.1 Mixed 75.1 57% 75.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.6 125% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 8x8GB 139 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	MC Read 36.8 MC Write 33.5 MC Mixed 30.8 96% 33.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4.6 14% 5.07 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CYPRESS11 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

System: Ztsystem CYPRESS11

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	1x
Xeon E5-2665 0IntelBench 67%, 1,061 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	3x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x
GeForce GT 740NvidiaBench 7%, 30,433 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LM480HCHP-000G3 480GBSamsungBench 95%, 6 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 64GBSamsungBench 56%, 3 samples	3x
AM472D3LD4P13C9EC 14x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 3 samples	2x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $340

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16