Asus P6T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P6T (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091112
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '17 at 18:14
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 71.3 2-Core 142 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 362 41% 319 Pts	64-Core 362 22% 362 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 60 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23565719	53.8% Above average	Read 230 Write 188 Mixed 179 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 22 103% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 36.8 DQ Write 70.2 DQ Mixed 21.9 26% 43 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20 5,436 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 205GB free Firmware: JP1OA25C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 96 (03) Spinup time 117 117 12897681603 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 8873 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 136 136 32 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 14913 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3900 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 8952 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 8952 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 158914510874 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	72.3% Very good	Read 129 Write 123 Mixed 71.9 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.28 80% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 75%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20 5,436 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 107GB free Firmware: JP1OA25C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 65537 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 104 (03) Spinup time 117 117 12897681603 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 7229 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 12915 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3900 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 7309 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 7309 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 163209478171 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	66.4% Good	Read 117 Write 114 Mixed 45.9 68% 92.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.13 46% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	44.2% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 16.5 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 11.4 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 64.5 62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	566x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	144x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	72x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	78x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	50x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	34x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	224x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	124x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	102x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $318

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16