Intel D875PBZ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	INTEL_ D875BZLK
Motherboard	Intel D875PBZ (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20050331
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '17 at 18:56
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz 1,108 User benchmarks, average bench 31% J2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Memory 68.4 1-Core 28.2 2-Core 37.5 33% 44.7 Pts	4-Core 33.8 8-Core 33.3 4% 33.5 Pts	64-Core 36.5 2% 36.5 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 38%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 357GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.06A00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 177 2025 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1963 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3137 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1556 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 357 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1605 (C2) HDA temperature 113 101 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 117 2278 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	61.9% Good	Read 109 Write 105 Mixed 69.2 70% 94.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.46 4K Write 4.06 4K Mixed 0.39 179% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 113%
Maxtor STM3160215A 160GB 629 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 51GB free Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 229063651 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3361 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 345285459 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13437 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3273 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 64 39 605945892 (C2) HDA temperature 36 61 111669149732 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 103 66 177392046 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 310124 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	26.9% Poor	Read 46.9 Write 46.6 Mixed 19.6 28% 37.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 0.89 4K Mixed 0.36 81% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 41%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 57GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 197 197 107200 (03) Spinup time 224 223 8758 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3183 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 4 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7825 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3006 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 737 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3116 (C2) HDA temperature 114 95 36 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 198 7 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 199 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 75607 (C8) Write error rate 200 192 1	44.5% Average	Read 71.1 Write 83.7 Mixed 20.3 42% 58.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.44 113% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 76%
Maxtor STM3160215A 160GB 629 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 6GB free Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 91 207343279 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 5102 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 258135760 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 10277 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3898 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 47 572325921 (C2) HDA temperature 33 53 103079215137 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 98 65 145607897 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 195 93 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	17.9% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 30.7 Mixed 20.2 20% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 0.85 4K Mixed 0.35 78% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.37 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Intel D875PBZ

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)