Asus M4A88TD-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A88TD-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '17 at 16:11
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 635
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 86.3
44% 67.5 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 171
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 33
Parallax 42.2
29% 37.1 fps
MRender 46.9
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 33.7
33% 41.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 434
Write 393
Mixed 382
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 11.7
59% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 13.8
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 11.4
29% 56.5 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
936GB free
Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 162
Mixed 150
119% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.31
90% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 112%
Seagate USB 1TB
509GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 25.5
Write 24.3
Mixed 24.1
32% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.24
66% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 148%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.84% Terrible
Read 26.2
Write 10.7
Mixed 14.7
19% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.65
4K Mixed 0.71
57% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.84%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.3% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A88TD-M EVO Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $245
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback