Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160818
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '17 at 22:56
Run Duration	246 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	56.9% Above average	Memory 93.9 1-Core 112 2-Core 119 70% 108 Pts	4-Core 119 8-Core 121 16% 120 Pts	64-Core 112 7% 112 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6598) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2927 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 387.87 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Lighting 188 Reflection 213 Parallax 213 153% 205 fps	MRender 137 Gravity 186 Splatting 128 121% 150 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 181GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 72GB free Firmware: B1Q6 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	109% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 489 Mixed 499 111% 498 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 94.8 4K Mixed 42.4 166% 59.3 MB/s	DQ Read 42.9 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 24.3 66% 130 MB/s
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8652 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2610 (B1) Unknown 98 98 41 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 53 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 143 (F1) Unknown 99 99 32514247656	84.3% Excellent	Read 509 Write 403 Mixed 417 99% 443 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 77 4K Mixed 21.9 125% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 41.2 DQ Write 80.2 DQ Mixed 21.9 28% 47.8 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 134%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC064MAG 64GB 1,591 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 22GB free Firmware: 0006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 24163 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3562 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 86 86 731 (AE) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 44397418779648 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 130 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 86 86 14 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	45.7% Average	Read 354 Write 71.4 Mixed 119 39% 181 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 2.82 78% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 71.9 DQ Mixed 25.3 49% 101 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 53%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 100 183782984 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 779 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 235296 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 921 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 237 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 58 555483166 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 7 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 961 (C2) HDA temperature 30 42 94489280542 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 8224862372471 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1266991078 (F2) Unknown 100 253 295952736	97.6% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 158 Mixed 171 128% 170 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 5.36 4K Mixed 0.65 194% 2.18 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 110%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 947GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 10107 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 67 66 10279 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4412 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 72 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 17771 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3104 (B5) Unknown 100 100 10959297 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 19 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 58 188979675165 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 72 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 637 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 71 71 301869	59.6% Above average	Read 88.2 Write 119 Mixed 108 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 2.43 4K Mixed 0.43 118% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 471GB free Firmware: CCF9 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Read 99.5 Write 149 Mixed 139 98% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.95 4K Mixed 0.17 65% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 15,285 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	62.3% Good	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 23.1 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 24.1 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 59.9 67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	228x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	103x
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	40x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	39x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	37x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $1,193

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16