Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170330
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '17 at 17:14
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	TUN-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	89% Excellent	Memory 96.9 1-Core 110 2-Core 216 82% 141 Pts	4-Core 437 8-Core 687 69% 562 Pts	64-Core 881 54% 881 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 368.81 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.3% Above average	Lighting 65.3 Reflection 63 Parallax 56.6 53% 61.6 fps	MRender 69.2 Gravity 58.3 Splatting 50.4 48% 59.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 256GB-$164 6,726 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.2.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 74211701 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 8830452784161 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1378 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 694 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 43 53 1013615755307 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 74211701 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 74211701 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 74211701 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 34357 (EA) Unknown 0 0 20604 (F1) Unknown 0 0 20604 (F2) Unknown 0 0 10644	57.9% Above average	Read 352 Write 206 Mixed 239 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 74.8 4K Mixed 13.1 82% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 37.7 64% 122 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 139 139 25788285192 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 488 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 119 119 35 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9677 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 483 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 515 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 515 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 197569282082 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	62.9% Good	Read 105 Write 115 Mixed 118 85% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 0.44 4K Mixed 0.11 40% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 100GB free Firmware: JKAOA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 104 (03) Spinup time 136 136 51576373748 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 8548 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 119 119 36 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 45421 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2848 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 8712 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 8712 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 266288496677 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	37.2% Below average	Read 67.8 Write 62.2 Mixed 68.1 50% 66 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 0.22 4K Mixed 0.19 39% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$234 3,507 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	MC Read 45.9 MC Write 44.2 MC Mixed 43.8 128% 44.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 23.5 58% 20.4 GB/s	Latency 50.7 79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	835x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	462x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	282x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	148x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	142x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	77x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	49x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $92Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $924

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16