Toshiba SATELLITE L50D-B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L50D-B (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Larne
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '17 at 07:43
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics 19,683 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	24% Poor	Memory 28 1-Core 18.1 2-Core 63.9 21% 36.7 Pts	4-Core 115 8-Core 118 15% 116 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 41%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$130 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 752GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 317 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 357 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 12 (AE) Unknown 100 100 230 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 69 52 206159609887 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 16112580231 (F7) Unknown 100 100 505402957 (F8) Unknown 100 100 82400733 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4385 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	40.9% Average	Read 409 Write 242 Mixed 275 68% 309 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 6.14 4K Mixed 4.9 30% 8.27 MB/s	DQ Read 35.8 DQ Write 5.95 DQ Mixed 4.91 8% 15.6 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 105%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1.5TB 771 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 673GB free, PID 5031 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 26.9 Write 24.1 Mixed 8.95 24% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 0.35 4K Mixed 0.17 20% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 33%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A302 320GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 148GB free, PID 0214 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.3% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 30.4 Mixed 14.9 31% 25.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.21 44% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB 40,451 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	9.75% Terrible	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 3.6 9% 3.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 2.9 7% 2.5 GB/s	Latency 267 15% 267 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 9.75% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE L50D-B Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L50D-B

CPU
A8-6410 APU R5 GraphicsAMDBench 32%, 19,683 samples	20x
A6-6310 APU R4 GraphicsAMDBench 33%, 10,893 samples	9x
A4-6210 APU R3 GraphicsAMDBench 30%, 5,378 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	20x
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	9x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,021 samples	8x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	2x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	13x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	7x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16