Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 18 '17 at 12:49
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 146
2-Core 294
97% 178 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 811
84% 676 Pts
64-Core 812
50% 812 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.10.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 90
Parallax 162
98% 124 fps
MRender 88.8
Gravity 118
Splatting 129
94% 112 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB-$105
802GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41000WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 497
Write 345
Mixed 309
85% 384 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 18.9
94% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 11.8
74% 173 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB-$105
405GB free
Firmware: X41000WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 500
Write 336
Mixed 301
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 11.6
84% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 69.7
DQ Mixed 13
21% 38.4 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 164
Mixed 162
120% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.23
108% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 89%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 127GB
116GB free, PID 00d9
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 42.2
Write 30.4
Mixed 17.4
35% 30 MB/s
4K Read 2.36
4K Write 0.05
4K Mixed 0.81
38% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 25.2
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 25.1
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $655
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback