Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	7.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '17 at 02:21
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 65 2-Core 124 57% 91.2 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 355 36% 293 Pts	64-Core 380 24% 380 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.9.2 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Lighting 63 Reflection 67 Parallax 79.7 51% 69.9 fps	MRender 67.6 Gravity 60.2 Splatting 55.3 49% 61 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 53%
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Nvidia(10DE 1033) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	35.1% Below average	Lighting 42.1 Reflection 38 Parallax 50.5 34% 43.6 fps	MRender 54.2 Gravity 48.7 Splatting 35.7 37% 46.2 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11578 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1135 (B1) Unknown 98 98 21 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 58 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 129 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16438584889	55.1% Above average	Read 345 Write 261 Mixed 224 61% 277 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 16.2 79% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 38.6 DQ Write 50.9 DQ Mixed 17.4 21% 35.6 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 118%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB 13,178 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 602GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 74 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 98 92 (03) Spinup time 124 100 25789792563 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2425 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 99 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 100 31 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 18287 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1622 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 82 26216226 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 132 (BE) vendor-specific 77 54 320274455 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2447 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2447 (C2) HDA temperature 253 139 197569282071 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	65.5% Good	Read 111 Write 118 Mixed 102 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.28 68% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 76%
Samsung P3 Portable 2TB 216 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 998GB free, PID 61c5 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Read 31.3 Write 83.2 Mixed 37.5 72% 50.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.23 51% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 47%
WD My Book 640GB 1,033 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 596GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 36.7 Write 33.6 Mixed 21.7 38% 30.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 2.38 4K Mixed 0.34 95% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 19,207 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.4% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 6.7 20% 7.17 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 6 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	138x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16