Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5650U 248 User benchmarks, average bench 56% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 88.3 1-Core 99.6 2-Core 168 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 266 35% 265 Pts	64-Core 269 17% 269 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile) 5,021 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Apple(106B 011B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.9% Terrible	Lighting 10.7 Reflection 9.88 Parallax 13.1 9% 11.2 fps	MRender 8.71 Gravity 8.17 Splatting 15.1 9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.9% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 124GB 3,905 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 70GB free (System drive), PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 128 Write 2.04 Mixed 77.6 71% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.06 4K Write 0.04 4K Mixed 0.62 30% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x483943434E4E4E424C54424C41522D4E5444 2x4GB 604 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 22.8 MC Mixed 18.1 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 17 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 6000 (Mobile)IntelBench 6%, 5,021 samples	270x

SSD
SM0128G PCIe 121GBAppleBench 143%, 564 samples	67x
SM0256G PCIe 251GBAppleBench 149%, 1,022 samples	56x
SM0512G PCIe 500GBAppleBench 162%, 1,474 samples	16x

RAM
0x483943434E4E4E424C54424C41522D4E5444 2x4GBUnknownBench 52%, 604 samples	70x
0x 2x4GBUnknownBench 48%, 498 samples	65x
0x483943434E4E4E424A544D4C41522D4E5544 2x4GBUnknownBench 60%, 246 samples	39x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16