Asrock Z77 Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 19 '17 at 23:01
Run Duration493 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 401
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.10.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.7% Poor
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 44.4
29% 35.2 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 32.6
25% 30.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 508
Write 409
Mixed 410
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 18.8
110% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 40.6
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 24.3
32% 55.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 111
Write 120
Mixed 100
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.48
117% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
667GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 160
Mixed 127
117% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.18
4K Write 2.85
4K Mixed 0.29
134% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99%
Great: 109%
Lenovo UHD F800 1TB
808GB free, PID 7309
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 90.2
Write 94.2
Mixed 90.1
119% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.3
83% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 41%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
781GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 25.4
Write 25.2
Mixed 25.2
33% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.35
80% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 42%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
257GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 40.6
Write 41.7
Mixed 40.7
53% 41 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.24
63% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 42%
SanDisk Clip Jam 8GB
8GB free, PID 74f0
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
4.18% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 4.47
Mixed 5.63
8% 7.54 MB/s
4K Read 5.64
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.009
22% 1.89 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.18%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Pro3 Builds (Compare 1,277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro3 - $212

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $492
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback