PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z77 Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130712 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 19 '17 at 23:01 |
Run Duration | 493 Seconds |
Run User | IRL-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
76.2%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.10.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
80.7%
Excellent
|
|||
66.1%
Good
|
||||
99%
Outstanding
|
||||
Lenovo UHD F800 1TB
808GB free, PID 7309
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
40.2%
Average
|
|||
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
781GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
15.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
257GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
19.9%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Clip Jam 8GB
8GB free, PID 74f0
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
4.18%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
50%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 458x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 199x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 174x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 118x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 88x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 73x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $492 |