Huanan X79

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Huanan X79 (all builds)
Memory	19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170307
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '17 at 13:56
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2665 0 1,061 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 88.2 1-Core 80.6 2-Core 154 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 563 52% 434 Pts	64-Core 765 47% 765 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Gigabyte(1458 360C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 387.92 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Lighting 44.2 Reflection 40.2 Parallax 52.8 36% 45.7 fps	MRender 52.5 Gravity 50.7 Splatting 37.4 37% 46.9 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3G37R5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 6 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1667 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 302 (64) Unknown 100 100 1649728 (65) Unknown 100 100 106336 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 120 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 99 99 716 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 831 (B7) Unknown 100 100 3 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 35 100 210454773795 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 6 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 6 (E7) Temperature 99 99 1 (E9) Unknown 100 100 4186 (EA) Unknown 100 100 924 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2573 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2240 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 36	59.4% Above average	Read 475 Write 222 Mixed 244 69% 313 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 28.5 4K Mixed 11.2 67% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 34.3 60% 122 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 88%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 70GB free Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 89 158891027 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6856 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 3 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 156659786 (09) Power-on hours count 42 42 51665 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6536 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 706 (BD) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BE) vendor-specific 68 48 555417632 (C2) HDA temperature 32 52 47244640288 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 72 53 178839306 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 174 240 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	41.9% Average	Read 70.3 Write 75.6 Mixed 69.5 54% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.38 94% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 54%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 69GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 173 6033 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2014 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 33 33 49021 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1984 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 782 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2019 (C2) HDA temperature 116 92 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 889 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	29.8% Poor	Read 46.2 Write 57.4 Mixed 48.1 38% 50.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.4 93% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- M393B1K70QB0- M393B1K70DH0- 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	76.2% Very good	MC Read 32.3 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 27.6 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 10.5 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 46%

Yacht

Motherboard: Huanan X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2680 v2IntelBench 71%, 1,619 samples	18x
Xeon E5-2670Intel $53Bench 67%, 4,803 samples	18x
Xeon E5-2660 0IntelBench 63%, 1,318 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	10x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	5x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	4x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
Smartbuy 120GBSSDBench 66%, 1,828 samples	3x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	3x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	7x
DDR3 1600 1x8GBAdataBench 24%, 898 samples	3x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $149

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16