Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Memory 82.1 1-Core 41.3 2-Core 72.8 45% 65.4 Pts	4-Core 139 8-Core 186 21% 163 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gainward(10B0 11C6) 2GB CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 387.92 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Lighting 17.5 Reflection 15.9 Parallax 21.4 14% 18.3 fps	MRender 21.9 Gravity 21.1 Splatting 15.2 15% 19.4 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z320 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.3% Below average	Read 253 Write 50.5 Mixed 55.7 26% 120 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 1.67 58% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 16 DQ Write 89.5 DQ Mixed 1.39 16% 35.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 332GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 104 Write 122 Mixed 106 83% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.49 114% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28% Poor	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 10.2 27% 9.43 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 7.3 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16