PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq dc5800 Microtower (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2820h |
Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20151026 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Oct 25 '17 at 07:46 |
Run Duration | 251 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
45.7%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
|
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
30.7%
Below average
|
||||
45.4%
Average
|
||||
30.9%
Below average
|
||||
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB
46GB free, PID 0111
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
9.02%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 44GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 24x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 9x |
Core2 Duo E7400Intel $130Bench 38%, 14,354 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 9x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 9x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $117 |