Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results


Gaming 124% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus Z97-PRO GAMER (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '17 at 18:45
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Memory 96.3 1-Core 136 2-Core 262 93% 165 Pts	4-Core 477 8-Core 702 74% 590 Pts	64-Core 697 43% 697 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.0 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	135% Outstanding	Lighting 193 Reflection 208 Parallax 187 157% 196 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 186 Splatting 124 118% 147 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160 11,290 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 408GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 612 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1349 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 38 (A3) Unknown 100 100 713 (94) Unknown 100 100 126149 (95) Unknown 100 100 1709 (96) Unknown 100 100 1570 (97) Unknown 100 100 1682 (A4) Unknown 100 100 31627 (A5) Unknown 100 100 79 (A6) Unknown 100 100 4 (A7) Unknown 100 100 24 (A9) Unknown 100 100 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 58 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 36430502297628 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 262866 (F2) Unknown 100 100 357447 (F5) Unknown 100 100 373593 (F6) Unknown 100 100 504596 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	66.5% Good	Read 481 Write 247 Mixed 266 73% 331 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 29 4K Mixed 18.1 74% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 46.9 83% 166 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 95%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 178 5858 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6189 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11187 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3321 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 572 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5616 (C2) HDA temperature 121 102 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 296 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	81.2% Excellent	Read 137 Write 145 Mixed 141 106% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.52 4K Mixed 0.2 105% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB 2,729 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 613GB free Firmware: JC4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 2 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 111 (03) Spinup time 127 127 21492728086 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4367 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 135 135 36 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9685 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3053 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5232 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5232 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 201864577056 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	63.2% Good	Read 108 Write 113 Mixed 97.4 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.28 72% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 64%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55 14,577 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 297GB free Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 84 204125741 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 9060 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 385940668 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 30172 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6148 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 49 571801634 (C2) HDA temperature 34 51 51539607586 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 63 49 229838717 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 95 248 5	42.9% Average	Read 74.3 Write 74.9 Mixed 75.2 56% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.42 99% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 44%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB 2,049 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1TB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 89.6 Write 74.4 Mixed 66.4 95% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.22 78% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB 11,630 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 24.5 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 24.7 SC Mixed 23.6 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 53 75% 53 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 2,859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,397x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	541x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	293x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	453x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	220x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	181x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	187x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	107x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	74x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	126x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	108x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	103x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $648

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16