Gigabyte GA-X58A-OC

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-OC (all builds)
Memory	15.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120306
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '17 at 21:41
Run Duration	293 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 980-$148 2,215 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Memory 96.3 1-Core 101 2-Core 204 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 601 60% 489 Pts	64-Core 705 44% 705 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3748) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2689 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.0 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 134 Reflection 150 Parallax 143 109% 142 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 137 Splatting 112 100% 123 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 21GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 956 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 155 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 48 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 150 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2531676781	99.9% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 385 Mixed 393 93% 419 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 70.7 4K Mixed 44.7 153% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 96.3 104% 175 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 17836 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1115 (B1) Unknown 67 67 392 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 47 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 4 (EB) Unknown 99 99 734 (F1) Unknown 99 99 43695196993	76.9% Very good	Read 468 Write 299 Mixed 322 80% 363 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 23.8 105% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 51 75% 142 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 901GB free Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 224741192 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1064 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 50373506 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8390 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1130 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 12885098504 (BD) vendor-specific 94 94 6 (BE) vendor-specific 68 52 555417632 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 956 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6651 (C2) HDA temperature 32 48 38654705696 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 177 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -81350975545416 (F1) Unknown 100 253 20423951306 (F2) Unknown 100 253 331539827685	86.9% Excellent	Read 142 Write 161 Mixed 108 102% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.23 76% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 114%
Corsair Flash Voyager 16GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 11GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	6.91% Terrible	Read 28.9 Write 7.59 Mixed 12.2 17% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.33 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 17% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.91% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	59.3% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 25.1 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 13.1 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 53 76% 53 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-OC Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Gunboat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-OC

CPU
Xeon X5680IntelBench 74%, 4,201 samples	21x
Core i7 X 990Intel $499Bench 78%, 4,994 samples	12x
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	20x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	12x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	5x

SSD
PLUS 120GBSandiskBench 43%, 16,974 samples	10x
SHFR200240G 240GBKingstonBench 83%, 2,078 samples	9x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	8x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	20x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	14x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $560

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16