Asus P8H67-V

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-V (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110816
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '17 at 12:14
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	67% Good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 92.6 2-Core 171 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 303 37% 283 Pts	64-Core 331 20% 331 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290 24,657 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Gigabyte(1458 21FD) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Lighting 27.1 Reflection 22.3 Parallax 24.9 22% 24.8 fps	MRender 20.6 Gravity 22.6 Splatting 28.6 20% 23.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 223GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 545 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 299 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 60 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 4 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4761427638	67.3% Good	Read 267 Write 211 Mixed 218 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 34.7 116% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 80.1 85% 142 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 94GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 168 166 6575 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4730 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4686 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1875 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 40 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 186 186 42467 (C2) HDA temperature 121 113 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	43.1% Average	Read 78.5 Write 71.4 Mixed 77.9 57% 75.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.15 66% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 67%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 38GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 142 140 3883 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4423 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6620 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2410 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 45 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4377 (C2) HDA temperature 111 103 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	54.3% Above average	Read 104 Write 85.5 Mixed 76.2 66% 88.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.33 87% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 4x4GB 1,349 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.1% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 15.5 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 15.2 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-V Builds (Compare 394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-V

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	65x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	58x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	29x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	24x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x

RAM
F3-12800CL9-4GBRL Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A-H9 Kingston 9905413-025.A00LF Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A-H9 10GBUnknownBench 43%, 16 samples	8x
M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 830B M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 16GBUnknownBench 50%, 8 samples	6x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $333

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16