Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170929
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 30 '17 at 15:25
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Memory 83.3 1-Core 116 2-Core 232 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 914 82% 690 Pts	64-Core 1,273 79% 1,273 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.0 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Lighting 141 Reflection 161 Parallax 147 115% 150 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 141 Splatting 120 103% 127 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	177% Outstanding	Read 1,388 Write 804 Mixed 1,007 236% 1,066 MB/s	4K Read 47.2 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 47.9 198% 72.6 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 125 132% 222 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 243%
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 76GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8098 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2138 (B1) Unknown 99 99 40 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 62 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 363 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9752769292	104% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 450 Mixed 469 105% 469 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 92.3 4K Mixed 38 152% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 116 118% 193 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 119%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 16GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11880 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3442 (B1) Unknown 95 95 173 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 62 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 845 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13369400654	70.9% Very good	Read 500 Write 286 Mixed 358 84% 382 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 18.2 86% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 78.4 DQ Mixed 57.8 72% 134 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 97516584 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6403 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 25805825760 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13506 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4152 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 25770196998 (BD) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BE) vendor-specific 66 52 571801634 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 937 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 85 85 30528 (C2) HDA temperature 34 48 81604378658 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -120203249703782 (F1) Unknown 100 253 -132364248732130 (F2) Unknown 100 253 -42848531807511	101% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 176 Mixed 143 124% 165 MB/s	4K Read 1.03 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.38 113% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 113%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 58GB free Firmware: 03.03V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 198 196 3091 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8389 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 23999 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7072 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 2140 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8391 (C2) HDA temperature 116 97 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45.6% Average	Read 76.8 Write 81.4 Mixed 90.9 63% 83 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.53 4K Mixed 0.65 156% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73 54,616 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 44 MC Write 34.4 MC Mixed 32.6 106% 37 GB/s	SC Read 25 SC Write 41.9 SC Mixed 30.7 93% 32.5 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)