Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardIntel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 31 '17 at 17:27
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 155
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 476
46% 377 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 83F8) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 364.72
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.3% Poor
Lighting 33
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 39
27% 34.4 fps
MRender 44.5
Gravity 29.5
Splatting 31.4
28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 60GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 332ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.9% Below average
Read 192
Write 59.6
Mixed 88.5
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 11.8
71% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 73.5
DQ Write 59.7
DQ Mixed 17.4
26% 50.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 80%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
314GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 110
Write 98.1
Mixed 65.7
68% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.19
72% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80
192GB free
Firmware: 12.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 71.3
Write 75.9
Mixed 70.4
55% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.34
95% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 32
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback