Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 02 '17 at 06:53
Run Duration417 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 975
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 53.4
2-Core 106
54% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 212
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Gigabyte(1458 368D) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.23% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 11.9
8% 10.6 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 13.3
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.23%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03D1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 461
Write 260
Mixed 352
79% 358 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 15.3
68% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 65
DQ Mixed 49.1
57% 101 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB
212GB free
Firmware: PB2OCA0G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 76.7
Write 79.5
Mixed 74.8
58% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.34
77% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%
Toshiba MK3256GSY 320GB-$90
142GB free
Firmware: LH013C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 86.1
Write 91.4
Mixed 94.2
68% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.39
96% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51%
Great: 52%
WD My Passport 07A8 1TB
392GB free, PID 07a8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 80.7
Write 87.7
Mixed 63.1
99% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.21
61% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 46%
Generic- SD/MMC 2GB
2GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Read 9.23
Write 3.45
Mixed 4.95
7% 5.88 MB/s
4K Read 3.09
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
13% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.2% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback