| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 30% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
| Motherboard | Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161208 |
| Uptime | 4.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 03 '17 at 01:57 |
| Run Duration | 181 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Single core | Quad core | Multi core |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68%
Good
|
72% 89.8 Pts
|
81% 359 Pts
|
54% 363 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 460-$104
CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
|
30%
Below average
|
29% 91.2 fps
|
31% 73.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
40.5%
Average
|
52% 69.7 MB/s
|
70% 0.48 MB/s
| |
|
|
85.6%
Excellent
|
108% 144 MB/s
|
105% 1.14 MB/s
| |
|
|
37.4%
Below average
|
47% 62.6 MB/s
|
17% 0.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
39.2%
Below average
|
38% 13.2 GB/s
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
56% 71.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,899 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $140
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700KIntel $300Bench 96%, 165,202 samples | 1,563x |
| Core i5-7600KIntel $229Bench 93%, 58,950 samples | 738x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $304Bench 83%, 44,621 samples | 152x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $413Bench 98%, 299,565 samples | 535x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $480Bench 124%, 247,201 samples | 441x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $289Bench 71%, 300,029 samples | 439x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 99% - Outstanding | Total price: $1,128 |