User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemRazer Blade
MotherboardRAZER RAZER
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20141222
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateNov 03 '17 at 10:00
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 85
1-Core 24.1
2-Core 70.3
42% 59.8 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 386
32% 275 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Device(1A58 674B) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7633
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 10
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 32.8
8% 18.1 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 36.8
27% 32.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTE256HMHP-00000 256GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT2200Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 492
Write 259
Mixed 348
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 12.9
70% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 95.1
DQ Write 57.9
DQ Mixed 30.4
35% 61.1 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 10.7
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback