Asus M4N68T-M-V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4N68T-M-V2  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100803
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateNov 04 '17 at 03:36
Run Duration96 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B50
AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 67
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 73.7
40% 60.5 Pts
4-Core 81.7
8-Core 74.8
11% 78.2 Pts
64-Core 68.5
4% 68.5 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a
Asus(1043 83A4) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.8
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
776GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 72.1
Write 71.7
Mixed 69.4
54% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.32
80% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
20.7% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 7
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.8
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N68T-M-V2 Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T-M-V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback