HP h8-1080jp

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP h8-1080jp (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AB5
Memory	6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110722
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '17 at 07:03
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	76%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	40.8% Average	Memory 55.6 1-Core 60.7 2-Core 95 43% 70.4 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 240 23% 191 Pts	64-Core 393 24% 393 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 530 5,672 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(1B0A 90A3) 2GB CLim: 699 MHz, MLim: 396 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.46 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.96% Terrible	Lighting 3.47 Reflection 4.35 Parallax 3.31 3% 3.71 fps	MRender 5.29 Gravity 4 Splatting 2.96 3% 4.08 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.96% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 853GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP63 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 63595511 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3347 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 458636696 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8162 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3342 (B4) Unknown 100 100 4220158253 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BC) Unknown 100 98 4295032842 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 57 555089953 (C2) HDA temperature 33 43 55834574881 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 41 30 63595511 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	46.2% Average	Read 93.8 Write 67.6 Mixed 80.1 61% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.22 4K Write 0.51 4K Mixed 0.2 41% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 68%
BUFFALO External HDD 3TB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 3TB free, PID 0286 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 139 Write 109 Mixed 99.3 142% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.29 83% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 70%
BUFFALO External HDD 3TB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1TB free, PID 0286 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 157 Write 104 Mixed 24 103% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.19 72% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 3x4GB 485 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	24.8% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.07 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 9.9 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 141 28% 141 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16