| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | ECS A55F2-M3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130507 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 07 '17 at 07:04 |
| Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 83% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
27%
Poor
|
31% 49.7 Pts
|
9% 64.3 Pts
|
5% 76.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
Elitegroup(1019 7C90) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.250.31.1000
|
1.76%
Terrible
|
2% 2.07 fps
|
2% 2.12 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5584-004.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
15.3%
Very poor
|
16% 5.43 GB/s
|
9% 3.13 GB/s
|
21% 189 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A55F2-M3 Builds (Compare 25 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: ECS A55F2-M3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A4-4000 APUAMD $171Bench 39%, 6,528 samples | 5x |
| A4-5300 APUAMD $36Bench 40%, 7,032 samples | 5x |
| A6-5400K APUAMD $120Bench 40%, 7,836 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples | 7x |
| Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples | 3x |
| Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $171 |