Scotty's Haswell/Kinsley Development

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	8.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Scotty's Haswell/Kinsley Development (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DZ87KLT75K
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150713
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '17 at 20:16
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 88.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 212 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 544 59% 466 Pts	64-Core 564 35% 564 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250 11,945 User benchmarks, average bench 7% EVGA(3842 1257) 896MB Ram: 896MB, Driver: 341.95 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	8.13% Terrible	Lighting 11 Reflection 9 Parallax 4.88 9% 8.3 fps	MRender 9 Gravity 8.87 Splatting 6.39 6% 8.09 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.13% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Inte SSDMCEAC180B3 180GB 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: LLKi Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -91594472525136 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 268 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 192 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 50 72 73019162674 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 192 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 165847 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 68 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 165847 (F2) Unknown 100 100 366737 (F9) Unknown 100 100 11825	70.4% Very good	Read 483 Write 177 Mixed 245 66% 302 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 80.3 4K Mixed 16.2 103% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 70.8 97% 179 MB/s

Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 36446464 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 36 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 11507442 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1181 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 35 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 71 471334939 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 17 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2773 (C2) HDA temperature 27 40 77309411355 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -80135499807640 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2083604223 (F2) Unknown 100 253 45161246591	93.8% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 155 Mixed 146 118% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.16 73% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 114%
WD WD20EADS-22R6B0 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 883GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 231 141 5441 (04) Start/Stop count 84 84 16173 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 40 40 44296 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 213 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 119 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 868140 (C2) HDA temperature 119 101 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	49.5% Average	Read 87.2 Write 84.8 Mixed 77.9 63% 83.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 2.39 4K Mixed 0.39 111% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 54%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27 3,642 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 6GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 147 Write 39.5 Mixed 20.1 64% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.61 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.77 80% 2.16 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE4G3D1608DE1TX0. 4x4GB 400 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.4% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 19 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 17.7 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16