Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	82.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120809
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '17 at 03:55
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	69% Good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 81.4 2-Core 160 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 406 44% 351 Pts	64-Core 406 25% 406 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.11.1 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Lighting 99.8 Reflection 88 Parallax 137 81% 108 fps	MRender 83.8 Gravity 97.6 Splatting 123 86% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ RevoDrive PCIe 240GB-$249 99 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 104 9670187 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 79164837211132 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1360 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 748 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 9670187 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 9670187 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 9670187 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4735 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3060 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3060 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4645	54.5% Above average	Read 391 Write 211 Mixed 252 63% 285 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 43.3 4K Mixed 9.06 65% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 8.93 49% 114 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 83%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 10GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1851 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 823 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 61 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 45 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2061566614	55.9% Above average	Read 370 Write 186 Mixed 234 58% 263 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 26.7 91% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 28.2 DQ Write 34.1 DQ Mixed 14.4 16% 25.6 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 134%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 12GB free Firmware: 03.03V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 195 195 3208 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2821 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13287 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1755 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 430 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2859 (C2) HDA temperature 115 101 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 185 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 185 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 1 0	45.8% Average	Read 80.3 Write 78.8 Mixed 76.6 59% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.95 4K Write 2.68 4K Mixed 0.6 156% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.9% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 15.9 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 11.5 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 73.2 55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,653 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	604x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	291x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	87x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	116x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	79x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	67x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	55x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	308x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	253x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	184x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16