Cytrix Complex 11t

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCytrix Complex 11t  (all builds)
MotherboardCytrix Complex 11t
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151010
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 12 '17 at 06:56
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core M-5Y10c
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
42.7% Average
Memory 56.6
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 118
47% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 171
22% 169 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300
Intel(8086 161E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Lighting 4.77
Reflection 6.58
Parallax 6.09
4% 5.81 fps
MRender 6.24
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 10.3
6% 6.92 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 64GB SSD 64GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1007C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 487
Write 162
Mixed 248
65% 299 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 20.9
63% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 19.2
DQ Write 31.6
DQ Mixed 9.11
12% 20 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 77%
SDHC Card 32GB
28GB free, PID null
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
8.47% Terrible
Read 27.2
Write 10.8
Mixed 15.7
20% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.28
4K Write 0.45
4K Mixed 0.45
43% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.47%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 13.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 15.5
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback